Now I am looking for your feedback!
I opted for using symbols for frequency and resonance, because I could not find a good-looking place for the letters xD It is reversible, so maybe I will do some letters on the backside.
I am not completely sure about the font, maybe a littel too playful in contrast to the exact lines of the symbolsâŚ
What do you think?
I like it! Itâs got style and character without being un-utilitarian. Can I assume the tiny dots and letters near the resonance knob are to be disregarded? Should it say âTransistorâ rather than âResistorâ at the top? I can see the font as being polarizing, but I like it well enough.
I really like it, though the wobbly circle around the top (I assume Frequency?) is the wrong way around to me, bigger wobbles look like a more open filter. Are the dots LEDs? The labels for those are super tiny. And Iâm a labels above. I do like the font. And the Resonance squiggles look great!
Thank you! Yeah, should be Transistor of course! The tiny labels are for trimmer pots, I am unsure how to handle thoseâŚ
Bigger (more spaced out) wobbles mean lower cutoff frequency, exactly!
I am also very happy with the resonance wobbles, they are rotated Legendre polynomials, I remembered them from my potential theory(?) lectures when we Computed the gravitational potential of the earth. Have not used them since xD
I hope it isnât too late to proof read your panel design. In the module title at the top, you have omitted the second S from the word âtransistor.â
No problem. Incidentally your font design rings a very old bell with me. Is it based on the inner sleeve of Led Zeppelin IV? The only Zep album I ever owned, and I remember the strange rendering of the letter o.
Talking of panels, I confess I imagined there would be a set of universal pictograms, but I havenât seen any such symbols on panels. I havenât really got to the point where I will want to design panel layouts yet, but it does appear to me that simple pictograms would be far superior to wording. Use of coloured washers on jacks would also help to identify types of socket. Another possibility is simply to set a standard for panel layout that places controls and jacks in predictable locations. This would reduce the need to distinguish inputs from outputs, for example.
I like the EuroSynth proposal. While the red and green washers shown here are very difficult for me to distinguish due to my colour blindness, it would be easy enough for me to adapt the idea.
Iâm not really interested in seeing designs become universal, I just want something I myself would find aesthetically pleasing.
I suppose Iâd want symbols to distinguish VCO, VCA, VCF, envelope generator, sequencer, and the like. Iâm not really interested in the VCO/LFO distinction so that reduces the number of different symbols Iâd need. Attenuation controls, function toggles, encoders, manual triggers and so on would need symbols. Perhaps a sheep might make it onto my panels, but I think I would favour simple geometric patterns. Iâm not a fan of woolly thinking or woolly music.
Serge adopted a series of geometric designs denoting signal types, input, outputs, and triggers. Colored 4 mm sockets were used for most connections â blue, black, and red jacks; blue for (unipolar) control voltages, black for bipolar signals (NOT necessarily AC coupled) and red for pulse/gate signals, although these were not rigidly enforced. Later, other colors were introduced, e.g. yellow for triggers.