Opinion time on Trim Pots styles

Hey everybody. I was wondering if anyone prefers either of these trimpots trim pots
I am thinking of going different format of bourns. But am interested in anyone’s thoughts.

I have a project For CV Joystick with stackable PCBs and it seems like the trim pots have a clearance issue. The brass 3m stand offs Don’t seem too come in the right height for proper contact with the expansion header. Although I do have nylon version that work height wise. I would prefer too make it easy to use brass stand offs. I plan on redoing the PCB after Redesigning with a proper LED driver. Then releasing the files.
HackaDay Project Witches Brew

2 Likes

Depends on what you’re trimming, but if you need precise trimming a multiturn trimmer is obviously better. That’s what they’re designed for.

7 Likes

I like the brass multi turn. The box gives you something to either glue to a face plate or pack up underneath from a circuit board to reach a face plate and the brass knob means you can solder extensions like metal tubes or attach gears or levers. Takes up less real estate on a breadboard too.

What about a trim pot that has side based adjustment? Bigger footprint tho, but side access would make it far easier to actually use.

2 Likes

image

4 Likes

That is a pretty neat variant. I am thinking of giving extra long headers a shot, Because there should really be a little bit more room for components even some of the caps are pretty close too top PCB. I might order some of these. Because it would be interesting to have access too the trim pots while they are stacked. Thanks everyone for the ideas. :smile:

2 Likes

Oh, that reminds me. I’ve been meaning to pick up a few of the splay legged single turn open frame ones. The Yusynth steiner filter I made PCB for has footprints for them and the BOM specifically calls for single turns. But all I have on hand are the box style multi-turn right now. I could make them fit…but…trim pots are cheap enough and I’m in no hurry so would rather pick up the style the board is designed for.

1 Like

I made a similar mistake when I built the VCO-1 from Skulls & Circuits … the simplest solution would have been to simply build the trimmers on the back.

6 Likes

Now that is cool idea. Thanks for sharing :smile:

2 Likes

sorry, made me chuckle :slight_smile:

I bet that was a real DOH! moment…

as mentioned it comes down to what your trimming and the accuracy.

The standard trimmer is good as a replacement for a normal POT where you need small footprint, set and forget with easy rough accuracy,

The Bours can be a pain without a trimmer driver (which wont work with a flush panel) and can be frustrating if located in an awkward spot. But they are the best way to get to x.xx accuracy ( and hopefully stay there )

Yes man, I can totally understand it, especially because I listened to my gut feeling beforehand and soldered the connector for the power correctly on the back … :laughing:

That moment came when I wanted to unsolder the trimmers and the first solder pad tore off … :man_facepalming: :weary:

1 Like