I’m trying to get this fabbed at JLC.
They replied with a comment about the holes for the jacks in the panel. Weirdly, they do not have a similar complaint about the sidekick panel
'The plating hole in your file is bigger than 6.3mm, there is the possibility of tin blasting holes when using HASL.
Would you please select one of the following options?
1.Proceed with HASL and accept the risk wihtout complaint
2.Switch from HASL to ENIG surface finish to avoid defective plated slots.’
Since its the panel I’m sure it wont affect functionality, but honestly I have no idea what this might mean. I guess I should tell them to just go ahead, but what do you think @analogoutput?