See
and the subsequent two posts. I always use my variant of the Alpha footprint. This I why I said
So could the electrolytic capacitors — of which I see zero. Really? No 10uF bypass caps near the power header? No 10R resistors or Schottky diodes on the rails either — well, that’s a choice and if you’re confident there will be no shorts and no power reversal that’s fine. But the 10uF caps are really recommended — mounted horizontally if they’re between the boards or board and panel.
They look like +12V and ground. I do see what looks like a header connection for +12V, it’s not obvious to me there’s a header connection for ground, though.
These kinds of leftover ratsnest lines, and the consequent nonzero unrouted count, bug me, so I use GND1 on one board, and I created power symbols +12V_1 and -12V_1, to make totally separate ratsnests for separate boards.
Hear hear. I still let the tight footprint through sometimes by accident and kick myself. Though I haven’t actually had trouble soldering one since one of my first PCBs when I went through about three pairs of transistors soldering and unsoldering until I got it without issues.
Here
you could avoid some very convoluted routing by putting some traces on the other side. Not really a problem, more an aesthetic thing. I also would connect C11 directly to pin 16 via a single straight trace but that’s probably fine. And I’d use wider traces for the power rail, as you did on the other board.